Statement on
Panel of Reference decision - New Westminster
The publication of the Panel of Reference report on the
diocese of New Westminster[i] is a significant moment in the ongoing Anglican
civil war.
Only now are the full implications of the Windsor Report
being tested within the world-wide Church. In our view most commentators have
ignored the significance of paragraph 146 of the Windsor Report and all that it
implies when it says on human sexuality:
it has to be recognised that debate on
this issue cannot be closed whilst sincerely but radically different positions
continue to be held across the Communion
[ii].
There is no definitive Anglican position on human
sexuality at this time and this means that those who are reconciled to
homosexual inclusion and those who are not both have a legitimate place within
the Anglican family of Churches.
For the debate to move forward adequate provision has to
be made for those minorities (on both sides) who do not agree with the local
consensus. These provisions have to be meaningful, but they have to be agreed
on locally and within the existing or expanded structures of each local church.
Those bishops and primates who
have interfered in this legitimate process in Canada (and elsewhere) have in
fact impeded reconciliation and the proper furtherance of the debate; it is
hardly surprising that Archbishops Drexel Gomez and Gregory Venables should now
be complaining loudly at the decisions of the panel
[iii]
The
diocese of New Westminster on the other hand welcomes the decision of the Panel
of Reference having cooperated fully in its deliberations [iv] as does the leader of the Anglıcan Church in
Canada
[v].
This report from the Panel of Reference also challenges
the vision and aspirations of the Global South group of Anglican Churches as
laid out in the Kigali Communiqué
[vi]. We are led to believe that this Communiqué represented a
compromise for those Anglican Primates who see lesbian and gay people as “evil”
and a “perversion of human dignity”
[vii] and who are promoting laws
[viii] that would criminalise even those who wish to have a genuine
debate [ix].
I can find no place in scripture where Jesus calls on
his people to behave in this way, and I am ashamed for them.
In the context of this uneasy compromise within the
Global South and taking into consideration the responses of Gomez and Venables
to the findings of the Panel of Reference, it seems likely that more extreme
agenda advocated by the Primate of Nigeria and others will once again come to
the surface. It is clear that those Anglican leaders do not agree that the
debate on human sexuality “cannot be closed” – they are determined that no such
debate should take place in their own countries and no one who holds a
different view should be allowed into their episcopate
[x]
What is more they are willing to destroy the Anglican
Communion to ensure this.
ENDS
For more information please contact:
Press Officer
Martin Reynolds
01633 215841
martin.reynolds1@virgin.net
OR
Richard Kirker
Chief Executive, Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement [LGCM]
07798 805428 (mobile)
020 7739 1249 (work)
020 7791 1802 (home)
Address: Oxford House, Derbyshire Street, London, E2 6HG
Office Tel & Fax 020 7739 1249
Christian Homophobia HOTLINE 020 7613 1095
www.lgcm.org.uk email lgcm@lgcm.org.uk
Registered
Charity No 1048842.