LGCM - HTL - Conference Address

Rowan W Smith



             “Our humanity is God’s glory”
 (The many faces of our Communion)
 

1.  Introduction                 

I truly am deeply honoured to have been invited by the L.G.C.M. to address this conference “Halfway to Lambeth” and focus in particular on what has been happening in our Anglican Communion since Lambeth 1998 with regard to the issue of homosexuality.  The honour lies in being what the church in South Africa sought to be during the apartheid years and what was epitomized by Archbishop Desmond Tutu in particular, that is to be the voice of the voiceless.  Many Anglicans in Africa look to this Conference to try to address the concern raised in 1998 by Archbishop Ndungane and that is to listen to the voices of Gay and Lesbians members of our church.  Thank you for enabling me then to speak out of our context in Southern Africa, representing one of the many faces of our Communion.
 

2.  1998

This conference is entitled “Halfway to Lambeth and is therefore looking from 1998 forward  to 2008 when the next Lambeth Conference is to meet and already we know that plans are afoot to explore the feasibility of it taking place in South Africa and that the conference is to be preceded by an international gathering of lay and clerical representatives at a Congress.  But Halfway to Lambeth needs also to look back at the 1988 Conference which referred to the issue of homosexual and the focus of our meeting here.  In some ways it seems that our fathers – in God, no women bishops were present 1988, were more enlightened then for the Resolution 64 entitled “Human rights for those of homosexual orientation” said inter-alia “urges such study and reflection to take account of biological, genetic and psychological research being undertaken by other agencies, and the socio-cultural factors that lead to different attitudes in the provinces of our Communion” (p.226) (Resolutions of the twelve Lambeth Conferences).

 The 1988 Conference was less prescriptive and drew attention for the need to look at biological, genetic and psychological research and acknowledged that we live in a fast changing world having to look at other agencies which means that we do not rely solely on our own ecclesiastical context.  There is also the recognition of other socio-political factors that influence our cultural attitudes.  It is a great pity, therefore, that Resolution 1.10 of 1998 made no reference to the resolution of 1988 and added instead references to another conference in Kuala Lumpur which was attended by only a portion of the bishops.  It should be noted also that the report from Section 1 (called to Full Humanity) had after its two-week discussion recommended that no resolution on human sexuality be presented to the full plenary session because there was no clear consensus on some of the issues.  Resolution 1.10 of 1998 was cobbled together in such a way as to undermine the hard work done by the working session, but that is all history since it was one resolution which produced a counter response which sought to give expression to a more pastoral approach as envisioned in 1988.
 

3    C.P.S.A

The CPSA in 1992 at its Provincial Synod in Swaziland voted in favour of women being ordained to the priesthood.  This was done against the background of changes in the Republic of South Africa since 1990 and the release of Nelson Mandela after twenty-seven years of imprisonment under the apartheid regime.  That Synod respected the integrity of individual bishops and diocese so that no bishop would be compelled to ordain any woman if they had voted against the resolution.  I was present at that Synod as Provincial Executive Officer and heard arguments against the resolution based on culture, e.g. women cannot be chief, scripture e.g. St. Paul on headship and the threat of further disunity with the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches.  But in the end it came down to a question of justice and what was right for the Anglican Church in Southern Africa since sexual identity is a given and we could no longer discriminate on the basis of gender as previously on colour.  On the question of unity, it was pointed out that the church of Rome already denies the validity of our Orders and unity had to be balanced over against justice.  One of the comments made after the vote to ordain women had been passed was “the next major debate will be on homosexuality”.   In March 1997, three years after our first democratic elections, the Synod of Bishops endorsed the report “Anglicans and Sexual Orientation” produced by the Southern Africa Anglican Theological Commission.  The statement from the Synod of Bishops in March 1997 acknowledge that there was no consensus among the bishops but went on to say “where we do agree however is that:    

as a Church we have been responsible over the centuries, for rejecting many people on the basis of their sexual orientation”.

and further “ As bishops we are unhappy at the tendency in some quarters to attack homosexuals on the basis of simplistic interpretations of certain scriptural texts”.

There is no doubt in my mind that the discussions in the Republic of South Africa, and I need to say that since our Province includes Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia, Mozambique, St Helena Is. and just recently, Angola, that diversity is accepted within our Province reflects the experience of the majority of our population under forty years of legalized apartheid and has influenced our response in other matters too.  The constitution of South Africa includes a section which prohibits discrimination on the basis of various categories including sexual orientation and recent challenges to existing laws on our statute book has seen the Constitutional Court  upholding the right of Gay and Lesbian partners to adopt and receive medical and other aid benefits.  The recent report of the Law Commission on the Marriage Act has put forward proposals which would recognize same gender unions.  The CPSA at its Provincial Synod in 2002 recommended that the Metropolitan appoint a Commission to investigate the blessing of same gender unions.  The Commission under Prof. Joan Church made an interim- report to the Synod of Bishops and recently our Provincial Standing Committee, the Executive body between Provincial Synods, passed Resolution 9:    Same- sex unions which said, inter alia : 

“We are called to discuss same-sex unions, particularly where this issue affects our communities.  We are talking about people in our families, in our churches, and in the body of Christ.  We ask Christians and parish communities to recognize this debate as a pastoral reality”.
 

   4.    Many Faces

It is important to bear in mind that our experience in South Africa does not mean that everyone accepts that there needs to be a change within our church as regards Gay and Lesbian members and that God calls us as we are through Baptism to bear witness to Christ.  There are those who argue that sexual orientation is a matter of choice, but only it seems for those with a homosexual orientation.  We are back to the New Testament and the Acts of the Apostles where those in Jerusalem argued that in order to become a Christian, Gentiles had first to become Jews.  Now some argue that we cannot be accepted in the Church, be ordained or have our unions blessed unless we convert and become heterosexual.  Africa, because of her history of exploitation should be in on forefront of those who celebrate our diversity and see that our humanity is God’s glory.  Slaves were taken from West Africa and exported to the United States where their dignity was further desecrated and their God given humanity denied.  In South Africa the slave owners prevented the slaves from being baptized since that would make them all equal and the growth of Islam in the Western Cape was in no small measure due to this act of discrimination.  Our experiences in Africa are not all the same but we all claim Africa to be our mother and her children has many different faces.  It ill behoves our fathers –in –God in West Africa to now deny us, as a church in Southern Africa, to hold a different position on the question of homosexuality and to resort to name – calling.  The Archbishop of Cape Town spent three years as a political prisoner on Robben Island for being a member of the Pan African Congress and it was on the Island that Archbishop Ndungane discovered his vocation to the priesthood.  He understands discrimination based on a freely given attribute such as colour and therefore has spoken out against discrimination based on sexual orientation. In his sermon, at the closing service of the 1998 Lambeth Conference (7 August) Archbishop Khotso Makhulu of the Central African Province said:

“From my background, I want to say here and now, I have resisted tyranny all my life and nor will I ever tolerate it from those who claim the love of the Bible over everyone else.  Let not the intolerance of a variety of contexts inexorably lead us to intolerance, which, if I am checked, will find us with a band of vigilantes and fundamentalists”. 

Looking at what has happened in our Communion over past month with regard to Canon Jeffrey John and Gene Robinson, one can see that Archbishop Makhulu was prophetic.  The enormous problems facing our Continent and the challenges God has placed before us, do not leave room for hatred and scapegoating.  The genocide in Rwanda was a result of such name-calling, you were killed simply for being a Hutu or Tutsi.  Even here the Church did not emerge with clear hands and allegations of complicity in the slaughter have been made against some of our own bishops.  We as Lesbian and Gay Anglicans and especially those in leadership have much to contribute towards the healing of our continent.  We are driven by a desire to love, to love those of our own gender and “Ubi Caritas et amor, Deus Tibi Est” where charity and love is, there God abides.  A recent BBC Publication, October 2003 has as its focus Gay Africa and one of the articles is written by Dr. Sylvia Tamale, a senior lecturer of law at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda.

She writes:  “Anthropological research shows that same-sex erotics existed in a variety of forms in at least 55 African cultures.  Moreover, such practices are ancient and entirely indigenous to this continent.  It is time for Africans to bury the tired myth that homosexuality has no roots in Africa”.

She further suggests that the colonial influences of Islam and Christianity were responsible for these present homophobic ulterances.

  5.     Going Forward

Halfway to Lambeth reminds us that we are all on a journey, a journey towards wholeness and holiness.  My personal experience as a Black South African has seen me having to confront my own prejudices as well as coming to terms with my own brokenness.  Some of it as a result of my social context and some of it because of my failure, for various reasons, to realize that my humanity is indeed God’s glory.  Despite my baptism and living family, we are nine children all together, I believed for a great part of my life that what defined me was the colour of my skin and that because of my colour, I was a lesser being.  But it was my involvement in student politics in 1960/62, just before I came to study at King’s College, London, which made me aware of my own worth as a person.  Then when in my second year at College I became aware of my sexual orientation, I wondered what God was up too, Black and Gay – who knows?  But my journey in the church when I went back to South Africa to be ordained and subsequent involvement lead to see that it is grace alone that enables each one of us to claim our God – given heritage that we are all, God’s children by adoption and grace and yes I want to sing to all the world that old children’s chorus:

                   “Jesus loves me, yes I know
                   For the Bible tells me so…”

As Archbishop Tutu used to say at rallies during the apartheid era, the Nationalist government should have banned the Bible because it affirmed that “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and gave his son to be a propitriation for our sins!!  (1 John).

Look into all our faces and see the love of God since we are all made as icons of God.  As Archbishop Rowan Williams said in his Enthronement sermon (27 Feb 2003)

“No one can be written off, no group, no nation, no minority can just be a scapegoat to resolve our fears and uncertainties.  We cannot assume that any human face we see has no divine secret to disclose….”

Thank you for journeying with me towards that place where we shall see God face to face and as our great African Saint, Augustine says: 

                             “We shall rest and we shall see
                             We shall see and we shall know
                             We shall know and we shall love
                             We shall love and we shall praise
                             Behold our end which is no end”.

Rowan W Smith
Dean of Cape Town