Welcome to the Lesbian & Gay Christian Movement

All the world's major religions are faced with having to come to terms with a modern understanding of homosexuality. The place of gay and lesbian people in the life of the Church is currently Christianity's most divisive issue. Confronting homophobia is its greatest challenge. The Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement is proclaiming a basic Christian truth. It is working for the very love and freedom that Christ brings to his people through his life, death and resurrection. LGCM is working for love, for peace, for justice, and for the promotion of the Christian faith especially within the LGBT community.
Christians at Pride Logo Faith and Sexuality Project LGCM Carol Service
  1. LGCM responds to the Adrian Smith demotion by Trafford Housing Trust

    28 October 2011

    Trafford Housing Trust LogoThe Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement supports both marriage equality and freedom of speech.

    Adrian Smith, a Christian working as a housing manager with Trafford Housing Trust, recently expressed views on his personal Facebook page which stated among other things that in his opinion gay marriage is “an equality too far”. He wrote that “the Bible is quite specific that marriage is for…men and women if the state wants to offer civil marriage to same sex then that is up to the state; but they shouldn’t impose its rules on places of faith and conscience.”

    As a result of expressing these views Trafford Housing Trust demoted Adrian Smith and cut his salary by £14,000.

    The Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement (LGCM) has been consistent in its support for marriage equality and believes that institution of marriage can embrace couples regardless of sexuality and gender. LGCM takes the view that this is consistent with a respect for Biblical principles, and would therefore disagree with Adrian Smith on the matter. However LGCM strongly disagrees with the decision by Trafford Housing Trust to demote Mr Smith.

    Rev Sharon Ferguson, Chief Executive of LGCM said: “There are a number of issues here. Mr Smith is in fact mistaken to think that marriage equality legislation would force religious groups to conduct same-sex marriages. Most campaigners are opposed to this. What we are asking for is the freedom for those religious organisations who wish to offer such ceremonies to be able to do so and for these to be fully recognised in law. To force a church or other faith community to provide such a service would clearly suggest a level of state interference which would have a questionable effect upon all citizens’ freedom.

    “Adrian Smith was foolish to state his views on his Facebook profile which indicated that he was employed by Trafford Housing. However, the views themselves were not inciting hatred and, as far as we understand, Adrian Smith has never been accused of discriminating against clients whatever their sexuality. It would not be unusual for an employer to reprimand an employee for publishing these remarks on a social networking site, when they so clearly contradict that organisation’s clear commitment to equality. So Trafford Housing may have acted with the best of intentions here but we believe they have overreacted and very much hope that they will reinstate Adrian Smith.

    Rev Ferguson added:

    “Sadly actions of this nature serve only to reinforce the view that Christians are persecuted under equalities legislation whereas in fact it is designed to protect and support us all.

    “LGCM does not wish to see the development of a suppression of dissenting opinion. We endorse freedom of speech and healthy debate. This is something which LGBT people are not permitted in many parts of the world. It would be strange for us to wish this freedom denied to others in our own society who in good conscience don’t agree with us.”



  2. URGENT Action Required – Abolition of Human Rights Act

    14 October 2011

    Human Rights Act CoverIn March this year, the Government set up a Bill of Rights Commission to investigate the possibility of creating a ‘UK Bill of Rights’. The Commission recently launched a public consultation phase, with a discussion paper asking people ‘Do we need a UK Bill of Rights?’. The public consultation is open until 11th November.

    If this Bill goes through the Human Rights Act (HRA) will be scrapped or at best, severely diluted and many basic rights and protections that we have fought hard to achieve will be lost.

    It is vital that anyone who believes in fundamental rights and freedoms has a say in this public consultation.

    The consultation paper can be found here and the website to go to is www.justice.gov.uk. All responses should be emailed to responses@commissiononabillofrights.gsi.gov.uk or sent to:

    Commission on a Bill of Rights,
    Postpoint 9.55,
    102 Petty France,
    London,
    SW1H 9AJ

    Please act NOW !



  3. The Big Lottery goes into partnership with The Daily Mail

    10 October 2011

    Silver Dreams Fund LogoThe new Big Lottery Fund called “Silver Dreams Fund”, which will form part of the Big Lottery’s pledge to support older people, has now been announced. This is wonderful news and much needed, however they have chosen the Daily Mail as their partner for this project and will be looking to readers for a steer on projects that get funded. They say their choice of partner is down to the demographic of the Daily Mail’s readership.

    
It is worrying that such an important funder for the voluntary sector is partnering with such a bigoted and phobic newspaper and consequently LGCM along with many other LGBT organizations have sent in letters to the Lottery to highlight our communities’ concerns over this. There is a real fear that issues of diversity within this fund will be marginalised and lost because of the partnership.

    In our letter to Peter Wanless, the Chief Executive for the Big Lottery, we point out how the Daily Mail has consistently shown itself to be homophobic and transphobic and to enjoy playing off Christianity against homosexuality. Furthermore, we list several points where this partnership goes against the Big Lottery’s own Equality Principles published in ‘Equality Matters – A Good Practice Guide’.

    Consequently we have urged the Big Lottery Fund to reconsider its decision to partner with organisations that continually promote discrimination.